Failure to record the logo supports dismissal
Failure to record the logo supports dismissal

Failure to record the logo supports dismissal

inside Muertos Roasters LLC vs Lukas Schneider The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California dismissed the infringement claim based on USPTO records that did not reflect activity from a parent company. The case is a cautionary tale of the importance of recording property transfers.

For many business owners, trying to keep up with trademark registration records can easily lead to oversight. Some may reasonably believe that trademark assignment is effective because of a written agreement between the parties that states the purpose of assigning a trademark. However, this is not always the case. While a written agreement is certainly necessary, yet front face The enforcement of the USPTO registration not only makes the activity binding on the prospective buyer, but also generally prevents loopholes in enforcement actions. dead roast that shows.

Read More :   Japanese town terrorized by monkeys attacking people and trying to snatch babies: ‘They’re so smart’

Muertos Roaster, a California coffee company, has filed a trademark infringement lawsuit against an Illinois coffee shop, Fire Department Coffee Inc., and its owners, alleging that the Fire Department has infringed on its trade dress. own market where she sells her coffee. The defendants moved to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and 12(b)(2), arguing that the plaintiff did not have the marks at issue and that the court did not no personal power over them. .

In granting the Coffee Fire Department’s motion to dismiss because it did not file a relief request, the court found that Muertos Roasters’ claim was based on ownership of the disputed trademarks. However, according to USPTO records provided by the defendants, the trademark registration and application belonged to Muertos Roasters’ parent company, Cup Half Full Holdings Inc. Because USPTO records are public and their accuracy is not trusted by the US.” a question can be asked”. The District Court for the Eastern District of California fairly noted the information and accepted it as true. This is despite Muertos Roasters filing a statement explaining its relationship with its parent company and providing a written business assignment agreement as evidence of the parties’ intent.

Read More :   Celebrities who inspired the Disney princess look: Audrey Hepburn, more

The court reasoned that the unregistered employment agreement was not subject to judicial notice because it was not linked to Muertos Roasters’ complaint, and the complaint did not allege that it had any trademark features. Because the court was not required to accept any factual allegations contrary to the court’s findings, it dismissed Muertos Roasters’ infringement claims for leave to amend. The company must now review its complaint to resolve the ownership dispute.

Read More :   Results of the CSE public service exam June 2022

As with all maintenance requirements, the extra step of recording the label job can seem time-consuming. This is especially true for companies with complex ownership structures and large portfolios of transferred brands. However, like most boring tasks, it is very important. In the context of transactions, a clean chain of ownership can increase the speed of transactions and the convenience of parties. And especially in terms of implementation, such as that dead roast, properly registered works provide certainty of ownership, allowing parties to focus on the merits of final infringement claims. To avoid major problems later, professionals and business owners should carefully and proactively update their USPTO trademark registrations.


Source :